Mining giant BHP Billiton says it has addressed all environmental, social, cultural and economic issues raised over its planned expansion of the Olympic Dam uranium and copper mine.
South Australian Premier Mike Rann welcomed the release of the company’s supplementary environmental impact statement (SEIS) on Friday, hailing it as a major step forward in the development of the world’s biggest mining project.
But the Australian Conservation Foundation has urged the company to reconsider its environmental assessments to take into account the recent nuclear crisis in Japan.
And the Greens said the company had largely ignored the 4000 government, community and private submissions to its original environmental impact statement issued in 2009.
BHP Billiton already produces 180,000 tonnes of copper a year at Olympic Dam but will lift output to 750,000 tonnes annually if the expansion goes ahead.
Uranium oxide production will jump from 4500 tonnes to about 19,000 tonnes.
The expansion is also expected to create up to 10,000 jobs, including 6000 in the construction phase and about 4000 ongoing positions.
The company estimates there will be about 15,000 flow-on jobs in the supply and service industries.
Releasing the SEIS, the company’s uranium customer sector group president Dean Dalla Valle said the expansion would pump billions of dollars into the South Australian economy for decades to come.
Mr Dalla Valle said the document was an important step in establishing Olympic Dam as one of the world’s premier mining operations and one of the company’s biggest single investments.
“Ultimately our aim is to help supply the world’s population with the vital resources it needs to power homes, build cities and grow communities,” he said.
“We have addressed the environmental, social, cultural and economic issues raised in those submissions and in doing so we have ensured the project will deliver the most advanced and responsible outcomes.”
But the ACF said the SEIS did not address the risks from Australian uranium being used in nuclear reactors overseas.
“In the same week the German and Japanese governments have made decisions not to proceed with new nuclear reactors, BHP Billiton has released a mammoth document that completely dodges the question of international responsibility,” ACF campaigner David Noonan said.
“BHP Billiton hopes to lock in the world’s largest uranium project in the shadow of the continuing nuclear disaster at Fukushima in Japan.”
South Australian Greens MP Mark Parnell said BHP Billiton’s latest proposal largely ignored the concerns raised in submissions and would pose major risk to local marine life, groundwater supplies and air quality.
He also called on the SA government to maximise the return to taxpayers by insisting that mineral processing be conducted in South Australia, rather than overseas.
“This stuff can only be dug up once,” he said.
“They’ve got to do it right. Read full post…